---
title: "Guardian360 vs Hadrian, an honest comparison"
description: "How Guardian360 compares to Hadrian: A Dutch offensive-security platform combining attack-surface management, continuous red teaming and CTEM. See where each one fits."
url: https://guardian360.net/compare/hadrian/
locale: en
source: guardian360.net
---
[Comparisons](https://guardian360.net/compare/)

# Guardian360 vs Hadrian

Works alongside Hadrian

Guardian360 works alongside Hadrian, covering the ground that vendor leaves open. A Dutch offensive-security platform combining attack-surface management, continuous red teaming and CTEM.

What Hadrian is good at

Hadrian is a hacker-led, Amsterdam-based platform for external attack-surface management, continuous automated red teaming and CTEM, with strong cloud and supply-chain discovery. It is offensive-testing led.

Side by side

## How they compare

|  | Guardian360 | Hadrian |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Company origin & data residency | Netherlands, EU-only | Netherlands (EU); Amsterdam HQ |
| Partner model | Partner-only | Direct + select partners |
| Deployment approach | Agentless SaaS | Agentless EASM / autonomous attack simulation |
| Compliance coverage | 25+ frameworks, continuously mapped | Maps to NIS2 / DORA exposure-management requirements |
| Intrusion detection | Built-in honeypots | Continuous Automated Red Teaming (offensive) |
| Microsoft 365 insight | Included | External M365 surface; no posture module |
| Container & cloud scanning | Planned for 2026 | Yes (cloud + DNS + supply-chain) |
| Mobile app | Yes (Android & iOS) | No |
| Automation & ease of use | High | High (AI-driven attack orchestration) |
| Pricing / MSP model | MSP pricing per employee / IP | Subscription per attack surface; enterprise-led |
| Auto-remediation | Partner-guided | No (validation focus) |
| Free trial / quick scan | Yes, incl. free WordPress plugin | Demo / POC |
| Smallest client size | From 10 employees / IPs | Mid-market 100 + employees |
| Data sovereignty (EU-only) | Yes | Yes (NL hosting) |
| Supply-chain compliance | Yes, NIS2/Cbw + CRA questionnaires | No |

Based on publicly available information at the time of writing. Vendors evolve quickly, always verify the latest details with each provider.

When Hadrian may fit better

Mid-market and larger organisations that want continuous offensive testing and external attack-surface discovery.

When Guardian360 fits better

Organisations that want continuous defensive scanning, compliance mapping, honeypot detection and Microsoft 365 insight in one partner-delivered EU platform, from 10 employees up.

Common questions

## Guardian360 vs Hadrian, answered

Both are Dutch, how do they differ?

Hadrian leads with offensive testing and attack-surface discovery; Guardian360 leads with continuous defensive scanning, detection and compliance mapping. Many organisations use both.

Is Guardian360 for smaller teams too?

Yes, from 10 employees, where Hadrian targets mid-market 100+.

## See it on your own environment

Run a free Quickscan, start a trial, or talk to a partner. Guardian360 is delivered exclusively through our partners.

[Run a free Quickscan](https://guardian360.net/quickscan/)[Talk to a partner](https://guardian360.net/contact/)